Corporate AV Solutions

Broadcasting the Boardroom

Learn how the top enterprise teams are building in-house production platforms to reduce cost, lower risk, and make live communication easier to trust  

A few years ago, most corporate AV teams were tasked with supporting rooms; a few screens, microphones, presentation switching, and maybe a stream when needed. That has radically changed.  

According to recent research, 98% of major enterprises in the US and UK now use live video streaming for major events. Those same teams are supporting executive broadcasts, investor calls, product launches, client briefings, employee town halls, hybrid meetings, training sessions, and content capture.  These are not casual meetings with a webcam or a shared deck. They are business moments. People notice when they go well. They notice even more when they do not. 

That puts video much closer to the center of the business. It shapes how leadership is seen. It affects how employees hear about strategy, and it influences how customers and investors experience the brand. That significantly raises the bar for reliability, support, security, and day-to-day operations for Corporate Comms, AV and IT teams.  

To understand the rise in in-house enterprise production, we spoke with experts at industry leading systems integrators and solution architects like AVIXA, CTI, Diversified, and Key Code Media about what’s driving the trend, and what it takes to build a world-class production live media function in your organization. 

“Enterprises are realizing that when video is used for executive communication or training, failure is not an option.”

Tim Kersting – Chief Design Officer, CTI

Why the old model is under pressure

Many enterprise AV rooms were built for a different job. They were designed for presentations, meetings, local audio, basic switching, and each room had a fixed use. They were not designed for frequent live video workflows, remote contributors, branded graphics, recording, post-event publishing, or quick movement between different event formats. Corporate communication has outgrown that setup.  

AVIXA’s 2025 Industry Outlook and Trends Analysis forecasts global pro AV revenue will grow from $332 billion in 2025 to $402 billion by 2030.  That growth shows a broader change in how organizations use professional AV. Corporate production spaces are becoming studios, briefing centers, broadcast environments, hybrid event spaces, training platforms, and content engines.  

“Global technology and SaaS brands are driving much of the investment, with heavily regulated and multi-site sectors like finance, pharma, retail, and higher education following suit.”

Phil Rapp – Senior Director of Engineering – Diversified

Internal events now need to reach people both in the room and across remote locations, sometimes on the other side of the globe, in real time. Investor briefings still need to feel polished. Client presentations need to reflect the brand and run seamlessly. Leadership updates need to land clearly, especially when the message is sensitive. That creates a gap between what older AV systems were built to do and what organizations need from them now.  

The business case usually starts with questions around cost:

  • How much are we spending every time we bring in an outside crew?
  • How many events are we producing each year?
  • How much of that work could be handled internally?

For many organizations, the answers are uncomfortable.  

One of our customers, a global financial services organization, moved from a heavily outsourced event model to an in-house production environment. The investment broke even within 18 months and now saves approximately £1 million annually, while also supporting higher-value client-facing experiences.  

Raising the bar for financial communications

See how one of the world’s leading asset managers has invested in a Broadcast AV solution to meet the growing demand for live corporate communications

The hidden costs of poor-quality AV  

The invoice from the production company is only part of the story. There is also the time spent preparing the room, coordinating vendors, and troubleshooting the inconsistencies that come from crews that are unfamiliar with the brand or its technology. Plus, there’s the internal stress and extra work required to ensure an event runs smoothly with a different setup every time.

For communications teams, those costs often appear as slower turnaround, less control, and more anxiety around important moments. For IT and AV teams, they appear as fragile workflows, heavier support demands, and a lot of pressure when the room suddenly has to perform like a studio.

Keep Reading: The value of working with a trusted broadcast AV partner

A town hall, a customer briefing, an investor update, a training session, and a hybrid meeting may each need different sources, layouts, graphics, audio paths, recording requirements, approval steps, and publishing workflows. If every one of those events has to be rebuilt from scratch, the organization is paying for delays as much as production.

This is one of the strongest arguments for in-house capability: it transforms event production from unpredictable, individual projects into a reliable operational model that supports the entire organization.

40% of people said a single poor video experience lowered their affinity for a brand

How Consumers Judge Their Viewing Experience — Conviva

What “broadcast-quality” means for enterprises: High stakes require unwavering quality.

A rough online team meeting is excusable. A rough executive broadcast is not. When quality fails, people remember.

When video is used for an investor update, product launch, customer event, town hall, or crisis response, the tolerance for failure drops. The audience may not know whether the issue was routing, audio, lighting, encoding, comms, or the network. They just know the message felt less professional than it should have.

A Conviva research report found that 75% of viewers abandoned poor-quality video within four minutes, while 40% said a single poor video experience lowered their affinity for the service or brand. The research focused on consumer streaming, but the lesson carries into enterprise communications: poor quality affects trust.

While the term “broadcast quality” in the enterprise space is often confused with picture and sound quality, the real meaning is far simpler. While these parts are important, they represent only part of the story. “Broadcast quality” is really about knowing the system will work when you need it to, regardless of audience size or the content being presented.

That means clean audio, confidence monitoring, disciplined control, redundancy, rehearsed workflows, clear roles, fallback paths, and support that does not depend on a single person knowing the whole system by memory.

Research from Tata Comms Media has found that 86% of companies believe corporate live-streamed events must exceed the quality of standard online meetings such as Zoom or Teams.

Zoom and Teams have their place. They are excellent meeting tools. But important broadcasts need a different level of control. Audio needs to be monitored. Graphics need to be managed. Feeds need to be routed cleanly. And the whole team needs to know who is making each and every decision. As one customer in our research group put it: “Less sleepless nights is key for us engineers.”

The New York Stock Exchange creates a steady stream of live content, including opening and closing bell ceremonies, corporate announcements, interviews, IPO events, broadcasts, and digital streams on NYSE Live.

“While solutions like Zoom and Teams are improving, true broadcast-grade production requires redundancy, disciplined audio, show control, defined roles, and active management.”

Phil Rapp, Senior Director of Engineering – Diversified

The new Enterprise AV model: Platform, playbook, and people

As live video becomes integral to corporate communication, supporting systems must be planned with the same rigor as other business-critical infrastructure. The principal risk is building a system without a defined operating model, not selecting the wrong equipment.   

The enterprises succeeding in this area focus less on buying better equipment and more on building a sustainable production model around three pillars: Platform, People, and Playbook. This approach is the key takeaway for organizations working to improve communications through in-house production.  

Platform

The platform is the production infrastructure: routing, control, graphics, audio, monitoring, recording, and distribution. It has to be resilient enough for high-profile events, flexible enough for different use cases, and simple enough for lean teams to run.   

Corporate communications teams rarely operate on a predictable schedule or with a single format, so a modern enterprise production platform must handle everything from live town halls and investor updates to pre-recorded training and marketing content. The right platform will allow your team to move between those formats without major reconfiguration each time, making the space more valuable.  

A common mistake is designing systems based on technical capabilities rather than operator needs under pressure. A system could be technically impressive yet a nightmare to operate. If it only works when the one person who designed it is in the room, it is not a reliable enterprise platform.  

“Central to the broadcast AV approach is selecting a unified control platform that integrates core systems into a single, consistent UI/UX tailored to common corporate production scenarios.”

Steve Dupaix – Key Code Media

Playbook

The playbook is the set of standard show formats, templates, approvals, run-of-show documents, fallback plans, and publishing workflows that make quality repeatable. Once the environment is configured and the workflows are established, the team no longer has to rebuild each event from scratch and can focus entirely on content quality.   

Troubleshooting approaches and escalation processes should also be part of that playbook, helping to make them part of your routine, rather than being relearned with each new outside crew. That rinse-and-repeat model reduces the risk of disruption and creates an environment ready for live communication at the drop of a hat.   

“AI-powered automation and preconfigured workflows will have the biggest impact on corporate communications.”

Mike Cavanagh – President, Key Code Media

You must decide what content will be produced regularly, who will operate the system, what processes can be standardized, how failures will be managed, and how the investment will deliver returns.  

The same logic applies after the event. A live stream should not disappear once it ends. With the right workflow, it can become clips, captions, translations, summaries, training material, sales enablement content, internal posts, customer follow-up, and archived material that can be found later.  

AI can help with repetitive tasks such as captioning, translation, summarization, metadata creation, draft clips, highlight packages, and content discovery. That can help teams get more value from each live event without adding another production cycle.  

Analytics is part of the same story. If a studio is becoming a business asset, teams need to show how it is being used. What content was viewed? What was clipped, shared, localized, reused, or connected to business outcomes? Enshrining these questions and gathering the data to answer them will help you create a feedback loop that ensures your playbooks evolve to keep your audience and your production team happy.  

“We are also seeing growing interest in analytics tools that show how content is actually used. That feedback loop is changing how companies think about communication strategy.”

Greg Garmon – President, Media and Entertainment, CTI

People

Many enterprise teams do not have large broadcast crews available for every event, nor do they need to build an internal center of expertise with the right Platform and Playbook behind them. With role-based interfaces, templates, macros, simplified routing, automation, robotic camera workflows, and graphics tools, and great support backing your team, they can produce a volume of content that once required far more people.   

In one enterprise deployment by Ross Video, events that previously required an outside production crew of 10 to 15 people could be handled by an internal team of two to three operators once the production platform, workflows, templates, and control model were standardized. 

For communications teams, that means more control over timing and quality. For AV and IT teams, it means fewer outside dependencies and a more familiar, repeatable way to support high-stakes productions — aka: fewer long days and sleepless nights.

The convergence of broadcast and AV is no longer a trend – It’s a reality

Broadcast and AV have merged. Audiences expect broadcast-quality, engaging video everywhere. AV teams must meet these standards with flexible, intuitive tools. It’s a cultural and technical shift driving professional live content anywhere. David Ross, CEO of Ross Video, gives the Broadcast AV Summit Keynote at ISE 2026.

“The trend towards more unified, non-proprietary AVoIP standards will continue due to the current success of SMPTE ST 2110, NMOS, Dante, NDI, and other open standards.”

Steve Dupaix – Sr. Director of Broadcast Innovation, Key Code Media

The technology equation

Modern enterprise production is no longer defined by a single technology decision. Success depends on how infrastructure, cloud services, standards, and support work together to create reliable, scalable workflows.

Hybrid production still needs a solid room

Cloud and software-based tools are changing enterprise production, especially around distribution, remote contribution, collaboration, scalability, clipping, captioning, translation, and publishing.  

But cloud does not make the physical production environment irrelevant. It changes where some of the work happens.  

“Cloud production does not eliminate infrastructure; it shifts it. High-quality capture, clean audio, proper lighting, reliable contribution paths, identity management, and integration are still essential. Cloud solutions simplify scaling but do not replace production fundamentals.”

Phil Rapp – Senior Director of Engineering – Diversified

For many enterprises, the most practical model will be hybrid. On-site systems handle reliable capture, local control, low-latency production, and confidence in high-pressure events. Cloud and software services help with distribution, distributed collaboration, overflow capacity, and post-event workflows. If the room is poorly designed, the cloud will not save the production. It may only move the problem elsewhere.  

Choose architecture that supports your path

The standards conversation can get technical quickly: AVoIP, ST 2110, NMOS, Dante, NDI, IPMX, and more. For corporate buyers, the practical issue is simpler: Will this system still make sense as our needs change?  

A system can claim support for IP, AVoIP, NDI, Dante, ST 2110, or IPMX. The real question is what that means in practice.

  • How does it behave in a live deployment?
  • What happens during failover? 
  • How are firmware updates handled?
  • Who supports it?
  • How does it integrate with monitoring, security, and network management?  

IPMX is worth considering because it brings broadcast IP thinking into Pro AV environments. It is based on SMPTE ST 2110 and AMWA NMOS, with added capabilities for Pro AV workflows, including support for compressed and uncompressed video and audio over standard IP networks.    

“With the integration of audio and video becoming increasingly part of enterprise communications, standards that can transfer both across enterprise networks with reliability and fidelity will be in demand. The current candidate that fits the bill is IPMX.”

Mike Sullivan-Trainor – Senior Industry Analyst, Market Intelligence, AVIXA

Support belongs in the design

Support should not be treated as an afterthought. It is part of the system. A production platform is only as reliable as the support around it. That includes training, documentation, escalation processes, service agreements, spare parts, health checks, and access to real people when something goes wrong.  

This matters most for lean teams. When two or three people are responsible for a demanding production calendar, they need to know what happens when the room behaves strangely, a workflow changes, or leadership asks for something new.  

Price and functionality matter. So does the answer to possibly the most important (but not always obvious) question: “Who will pick up the phone to help when something doesn’t work?”  

From design concepts to commissioning, the Ross team supports Corporate media deployments at every stage of the project

How to build the business case for your enterprise AV platform

The business case should start with the numbers that are easiest to measure: outside production cost per event, annual event volume, total production spend, rented equipment, internal staffing, and the expected reduction in external crew.  

Then look at the operating model. How much time is lost to setup? How often does the team rebuild the same workflow? How many events could be handled internally with the right templates and training? How quickly could the organization respond when leadership needs to communicate?  

The strongest ROI usually comes from four areas:  

  1. Cost reduction: Lower external production spend, fewer rentals, smaller crews, and less vendor management.  
  2. Operational efficiency: Faster setup, fewer changeovers, less troubleshooting, repeatable show formats, and lean-team operation.  
  3. Business value: More content from each event, faster publishing, stronger brand control, better client-facing experiences, higher room utilization, and more use from the same space.  
  4. Risk reduction: Better reliability, clearer failover plans, stronger support, and less reputational risk during executive events.  

One question you can ask to help focus the conversation is: how many events does this system need to replace before it pays back? In some enterprise environments, the answer is lower than expected.  

 

The easy way to look great live

Look sharp, sound clear, and stay in control every time you go live. Ross Video’s easy-to-use video solutions help you run flawless hybrid meetings, broadcast high-quality live events, and share your message from any location.

Build a production environment the business can actually use

For teams planning a new deployment, the starting point should be the work the business does most often.

  • What events happen every month?
  • What needs to be captured?
  • Who operates the room?
  • What can be templated?
  • Where are the failure points?
  • What happens after the stream ends?
  • Who supports the system when something changes?  

The goal is not to recreate a broadcast truck inside your headquarters. It is to build a production environment that makes communication more valuable for your business. 

If you want to understand more about how to build a content production powerhouse in your organization, click here to speak with one of the enterprise AV strategy experts at Ross Video.